The article talks about " t'bukrin homeland " or " new life " and these can not perceived as praise for dictatorship as long as the country was under communist rule . But even music text , no organic links with the regime . As much as it can be sung without any change even today , although the " Bukri home " is not yet as we want . Everything explicit text is simply human . It's nostalgia for a couple of martuarish Waltz of youth gone , where lie the roots of their love . And waltz as he restores them . In the verses of " happiness waltz " a waltz find happiness , life invincible tendency to bud in censorship or self-censorship gërxhin totalitarian . Are particles that enabled human gladness , if needed , transhendimin dictatorship , moments of escape from it . A rest that enable biological survival within the dictatorship . Almost like a cell .
I think Lobonja appeared , in the case of " Valsit " , a severity similar to that of the regime that banned songs of the West . As Waltz was created in the years of socialism , is a song that not worth it ? Reports of artistic creation policy are not so simple . But for this , I find it difficult to even Lubonja keqgjykoj . For all of us who have not fallen into the prisons of the dictatorship , had the luxury of particles peshkonim pleasure from songs regime . Meanwhile , for those who were affected as Lobonja Communist Hell , these songs can not perceived with disgust as makeup ( and they actually play in this feature ) , the Hell that we do not suffer . Who is right? It is an extremely complex can not believe that this generation can solve . It's so tricky , as you fear being put fire all artworks communist , someone will come to the rally as arson Jan Hus old lady : Santa semplicita !
No comments:
Post a Comment